Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Estimated Count of Dec 2012 Southern Region Polling



  • TN could have polled 7500+, out of which 4917 is from Chennai, balance from rest of TN
  • KL could have polled 2000+, out of which 650 is from EKM
  • KA could have polled 4000+, out of which 2998 is from Bengaluru
  • AP could have polled 5000+, out of which 2900+ is from HYD
  • In TOTO the total should be minimum of 18K+
  • The quota for RC should be 1200+ and the quota for CC should be 2250+

Who will be first 3 this time in RC Elections? Any Wild Guess.....

S.No Name Place First Count Ranking
4 CA. Babu Abraham  Kochi                   953 1
16 CA. Prasanna Kumar D.  Visakhapatnam                   940 2
29 CA. Suresh P.R.  Bangalore                   882 3
15 CA. Phalguna Kumar E.  Tirupati                   786 4
35 CA. Viswanath K.  Bangalore                   729 5
10 CA. Murali S.  Coimbatore                   695 6
22 CA. Shanmukha Sundaram K.  Coimbatore                   657 7
25 CA. Srinivas C.S.  Bangalore                   646 8
26 CA. Sumermal D. Ostawal  Hubli                   611 9
18 CA. Rajgopal A.  Madurai                   607 10
17 CA. Rajarajeswaran P.V.  Bangalore                   564 11
6 CA. Gopal Krishna Raju  Chennai                   540 12
13 CA. Naresh Chandra Gelli V.  Hyderabad                   531 13
14 CA. Pankaj Kumar Trivedi  Hyderabad                   520 14
3 CA. Aruloli P.R.  Chennai                   499 15
1 CA. Alagappan V.  Tiruchirapalli                   490 16
21 CA. Satyanarayana GVV  Vijayawada                   470 17
8 CA. Jose V X  Kochi                   429 18
2 CA. Amrit Kumar K.  Hyderabad                   402 19
7 CA. Gopalakrishnan T.R.  Chennai                   386 20
24 CA. Sivakumar R.  Chennai                   383 21
32 CA. Tony M P  Thrissur                   299 22
30 CA. Tara Chand Mehta  Bangalore                   287 23
19 CA. Ramamoorthy V.  Chennai                   282 24
11 CA. Muralidharan K.P.  Chennai                   251 25
27 CA. Sunil Kumar Jain P.  Chennai                   247 26
5 CA. Chakra Pani B  Hyderabad                   217 27
20 CA. Ranjit Karthikeyan M R  Thiruvananthapuram                   211 28
23 CA. Shenbagamoorthy C. Sivakasi                   198 29
34 CA. Venkatesu Reddy T.  Tirupati                   170 30
33 CA. Umamaheswara Rao O.K.  Chennai                   158 31
28 CA. Suresh Kumar N.   Kollam                   146 32
9 CA. Mohamed Shafi M.A.  Chennai                   119 33
31 CA. Thomachen T.A.   Thrissur                   104 34
12 CA. Nagaraja Gupta P.V.  Bangalore                      91 35
TOTAL VOTES              15,500

The above list is the first count results during the 2009 elections. The highlighted ones are the candidates who are contesting in 2012 elections.

Who will be the probable top three first count contestants? Any Guess.........!!!!!!!

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Quota - Demystified


Quota

The quota (sometimes called the threshold) is the number of votes a candidate must receive to be elected. The Hare quota and the Droop quota are commonly used to determine the quota.

HARE Quota:

When Thomas Hare originally conceived his version of Single Transferable Vote, he envisioned using the quota:


Quota = Votes polled
Available Seats
 

In the unlikely event that each successful candidate receives exactly the same number of votes not enough candidates can meet the quota and fill the available seats in one count. Thus the last candidate cannot not meet the quota, and it may be fairer to eliminate that candidate. 

To avoid this situation, it is common instead to use the Droop quota, which is always lower than the Hare quota.

DROOP quota: (ICAI  Method)

The most common quota formula is the Droop quota which given as: 

Quota = (Votes polled) + 1
(Available Seats + 1)

Droop produces a lower quota than Hare. If each ballot has a full list of preferences, Droop guarantees that every winner meets the quota rather than being elected as the last remaining candidate after lower candidates are eliminated. The fractional part of the resulting number, if any, is dropped (the result is rounded down to the next whole number.)

It is only necessary to allocate enough votes to ensure that no other candidate still in contention could win. This leaves nearly one quota's worth of votes unallocated, but counting these would not alter the outcome.

Droop is the only whole-number threshold for which 

(a) a majority of the voters can be guaranteed to elect a majority of the seats when there is an odd number of seats; 

(b) for a fixed number of seats.

Each winner's surplus votes transfer to other candidates according to their remaining preferences. 

Monday, December 10, 2012

Proportional Representation

Proportional Representation or Single Transferable System of Voting

Single Transferable Vote


What: The single transferable vote (STV) is a voting system designed to achieve proportional representation through ranked voting. Under STV, an elector's vote is initially allocated to his or her most preferred candidate, and then, after candidates have been either elected or eliminated, any surplus or unused votes are transferred according to the voter's stated preferences. 

Why: The system minimizes "wasted" votes, provides approximately proportional representation, and enables votes to be explicitly cast for individual candidates rather than for closed syndicate of contestants. 

How: It achieves this by using multi-seat constituencies (different regions) and by transferring votes to other eligible candidates that would otherwise be wasted on sure losers or sure winners.

Andrew Inglis Clark

ICAI Elections: A modified version of STV, known as the Hare–Clark system, is used in ICAI elections. The name is derived from Thomas Hare, who initially developed the system and the Tasmanian Attorney General, Andrew Inglis Clark, who worked to have a modified version introduced. Its critics contend that some voters find the mechanisms behind STV difficult to understand, but this does not make it more difficult for voters to 'rank the list of candidates in order of preference' in an STV ballot paper.
Thomas Hare

History of STV: The concept of transferable voting was first proposed by Thomas Wright Hill in 1821. The system remained unused in real elections until 1855, when Carl Andræ proposed a transferable vote system for elections in Denmark. Andræ's system was used in 1856 to elect the Danish Rigsraad, and by 1866 it was also adapted for indirect elections to the second chamber, the Landsting, until 1915.


Sunday, December 9, 2012

RC Candidates DOB and Age


S No Name of the Candidate PLACE State DOB AGE
1 ADUSUMILLI VENKATESWARA RAO  HYDERABAD  AP 10-Jun-1962 50.5
2 ALAGAPPAN V  TIRUCHIRAPALLI  TN 7-Apr-1967 45.7
3 AMRIT KUMAR K  HYDERABAD AP 28-Jun-1960 52.4
4 ARULOLI P R  CHENNAI TN 25-Sep-1966 46.2
5 BHAGERIA VIJAY KUMAR  SECUNDERABAD AP 8-May-1977 35.6
6 DHAVALAGI CHANDRAMAPPA RAMANNA  HUBLI KA 8-Jul-1969 43.4
7 GOPAL KRISHNA RAJU  CHENNAI TN 3-Jul-1974 38.4
8 GOPALAKRISHNAN T R CHENNAI TN 29-Jul-1972 40.4
9 HARIHARAN C S  CHENNAI TN 7-Mar-1968 44.8
10 JOMON K GEORGE  KOCHI KL 27-May-1967 45.5
11 JOSE V X  KOCHI KL 16-Mar-1966 46.7
12 JOSEPH ARPUTHA RAJ A  PANRUTI TN 24-May-1972 40.5
13 KUNDA RAMA NARAYANA  VIJAYAWADA AP 21-Jan-1981 31.9
14 MAHESWARAN R  COIMBATORE TN 29-Jun-1960 52.4
15 MOHAMED SHAFI M A  CHENNAI TN 30-Jul-1947 65.4
16 MURALIDHARAN K P CHENNAI TN 18-Nov-1961 51.1
17 NARESH CHANDRA GELLI V  HYDERABAD AP 19-Jan-1965 47.9
18 NITHIN M  BANGALORE KA 12-Jun-1976 36.5
19 PHALGUNA KUMAR E  TIRUPATI AP 15-Jul-1955 57.4
20 PRASANNA KUMAR D  VISAKHAPATNAM AP 22-Jul-1960 52.4
21 RAJARAJESWARAN P V  MADURAI TN 6-Jul-1958 54.4
22 SATHYAMOORTHY N  CHENNAI TN 31-Jul-1975 37.4
23 SEKKIZHAR B  HYDERABAD AP 14-Jun-1969 43.5
24 SHENBAGAMOORTHY C  SIVAKASI TN 15-May-1957 55.6
25 SIVARAM B K  AYYAMPET TN 30-Jul-1967 45.4
26 SRINIVAS C S  BANGALORE KA 16-Aug-1970 42.3
27 SRIPRIYA K Ms.  CHENNAI TN 26-Sep-1973 39.2
28 SUBRAMONIYA SARMA N  THIRUVANANTHAPURAM KL 29-May-1967 45.5
29 SUMERMAL D OSTAWAL  HUBLI KA 28-Aug-1958 54.3
30 SUNIL KUMAR JAIN P  CHENNAI TN 23-Sep-1960 52.2
31 SURESH P R  BANGALORE KA 16-Sep-1963 49.2
32 UMAMAHESWARA RAO O K  CHENNAI TN 21-May-1971 41.6
33 VELURI YASASWY SARMA  CHENNAI TN 16-Jul-1988 24.4
34 VENKATESU REDDY T  TIRUPATI AP 14-Jun-1969 43.5

RC Candidates Contact


S No Name of the Candidate PLACE State Mobile #
1 ADUSUMILLI VENKATESWARA RAO  HYDERABAD  AP 9246539869
2 ALAGAPPAN V  TIRUCHIRAPALLI  TN 9443155544
3 AMRIT KUMAR K  HYDERABAD AP 9391009332
4 ARULOLI P R  CHENNAI TN 9884061348
5 BHAGERIA VIJAY KUMAR  SECUNDERABAD AP 9391165099
6 DHAVALAGI CHANDRAMAPPA RAMANNA  HUBLI KA 9448111377
7 GOPAL KRISHNA RAJU  CHENNAI TN 9840063269
8 GOPALAKRISHNAN T R CHENNAI TN 9841095608
9 HARIHARAN C S  CHENNAI TN 9840181312
10 JOMON K GEORGE  KOCHI KL 9847031343
11 JOSE V X  KOCHI KL 9447043816
12 JOSEPH ARPUTHA RAJ A  PANRUTI TN 9842677056
13 KUNDA RAMA NARAYANA  VIJAYAWADA AP 9849420772
14 MAHESWARAN R  COIMBATORE TN 9894070752
15 MOHAMED SHAFI M A  CHENNAI TN 9941141237
16 MURALIDHARAN K P CHENNAI TN 9840044038
17 NARESH CHANDRA GELLI V  HYDERABAD AP 9849165491
18 NITHIN M  BANGALORE KA 9945682356
19 PHALGUNA KUMAR E  TIRUPATI AP 9441886303
20 PRASANNA KUMAR D  VISAKHAPATNAM AP 9848192636
21 RAJARAJESWARAN P V  MADURAI TN 9843036311
22 SATHYAMOORTHY N  CHENNAI TN 9444130300
23 SEKKIZHAR B  HYDERABAD AP 9949358838
24 SHENBAGAMOORTHY C  SIVAKASI TN 9443131792
25 SIVARAM B K  AYYAMPET TN 9443678515
26 SRINIVAS C S  BANGALORE KA 9845063387
27 SRIPRIYA K Ms.  CHENNAI TN 9841026973
28 SUBRAMONIYA SARMA N  THIRUVANANTHAPURAM KL 9847065706
29 SUMERMAL D OSTAWAL  HUBLI KA 9448115971
30 SUNIL KUMAR JAIN P  CHENNAI TN 9962699000
31 SURESH P R  BANGALORE KA 9845058988
32 UMAMAHESWARA RAO O K  CHENNAI TN 9884083971
33 VELURI YASASWY SARMA  CHENNAI TN 7200324403
34 VENKATESU REDDY T  TIRUPATI AP 9246998838